S.J.Res. 89 · 119th Congress
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Where it stands
- Introduced Done · Oct 8, 2025
- Committee Done · Oct 8, 2025
- Passed Senate Not yet
- Passed House Not yet
- President Not yet
- Law Not yet
From the official actions on Congress.gov.
Key points
- What it changes
- A plain-language summary isn't ready yet. The official summary below describes the bill.
- Who it affects
- A plain-language summary isn't ready yet. The official summary below describes the bill.
- What it costs
- No cost estimate yet.
- Where it stands
- Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395) (Nov 20, 2025)
- What happens next
- A committee would usually act on it before the full Senate votes.
Official summary
This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on November 20, 2024, which amended the 2015 resource management plan (RMP) for the Buffalo Field Office in Wyoming to make no federal coal available for future leasing. Thus, the joint resolution requires the BLM to follow the 2015 RMP as it was before it was amended in 2024 and make coal available for leasing. By way of background, the BLM developed the amendment to the plan in response to Western Organization of Resource Councils v. Bureau of Land Management. In that case, the court held that the BLM must evaluate the climate impacts of federal coal leasing in the Buffalo Field Office and include alternatives to limit or stop coal leasing in the evaluation in order to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. After conducting the evaluation, the BLM amended the RMP and made BLM-managed coal resources in the Buffalo Field Office planning area unavailable for future leasing.
Summary by the Congressional Research Service (Introduced in Senate version), via Congress.gov. These are proposed provisions, not enacted law.
Recorded votes
-
On the Motion to Proceed: Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51–47)
This vote set how the bill is debated. It is not a vote for or against the bill.Votes by party
How each party voted on roll call 621 Party Yes No Present Did not vote Share voting Yes Democratic 0 45 0 0 Republican 51 0 0 2 Independent 0 2 0 0 Party totals from the official roll call.
Map: how each state voted
Each state is shaded by the share of its senators who voted Yes, out of those who voted Yes or No. Colors show the vote, not party.
U.S. Senate roll call vote (data via Voteview, UCLA) ↗ — includes how every member voted
Vote types come from the official question text. How we label votes
Legislative history
- Nov 20, 2025Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)
- Nov 19, 2025Measure laid before Senate by motion.
- Nov 19, 2025Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 47. Record Vote Number: 621.
- Nov 18, 2025Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 270.
- Nov 18, 2025Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Nov 18, 2025Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Oct 8, 2025Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- Oct 8, 2025Introduced in Senate