Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Where it stands

1. Introduced Done · Jan 20, 2026
2. Committee Done · Jan 20, 2026
3. Agreed to in House Done · Jan 21, 2026

From the official actions on Congress.gov. Resolutions of this kind don't go to the President.

Key points

What it changes

A plain-language summary isn't ready yet. The official summary below describes the bill.

Who it affects

A plain-language summary isn't ready yet. The official summary below describes the bill.

What it costs

No cost estimate yet.

Where it stands

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. (Jan 21, 2026)

What happens next

The House agreed to it. A simple resolution applies only to the House and does not become law.

Official summary

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Summary by the Congressional Research Service (Reported to House version), via Congress.gov.

Recorded votes

1. HOUSEProceduralJan 21, 2026 · roll call 35

   On Agreeing to the Resolution: Passed (213–210)

   This vote approved the rule that sets how the bill is debated. It is not a vote for or against the bill.
   Votes by party

   How each party voted on roll call 35

   Party	Yes	No	Present	Did not vote	Share voting Yes
   Democratic	0	210	0	3
   Republican	213	0	0	5
   Independent	0	0	0	0

   Party totals from the official roll call.

   Map: how each state voted

   All voted YesSplitAll voted NoNo Yes or No votes

   Each state is shaded by the share of its U.S. House members who voted Yes, out of those who voted Yes or No. Colors show the vote, not party.

   Office of the Clerk, U.S. House ↗ — includes how every member voted

2. HOUSEProceduralJan 21, 2026 · roll call 34

   On Ordering the Previous Question: Passed (212–210)

   This vote set how the bill is debated. It is not a vote for or against the bill.
   Votes by party

   How each party voted on roll call 34

   Party	Yes	No	Present	Did not vote	Share voting Yes
   Democratic	0	210	0	3
   Republican	212	0	0	6
   Independent	0	0	0	0

   Party totals from the official roll call.

   Map: how each state voted

   All voted YesSplitAll voted NoNo Yes or No votes

   Each state is shaded by the share of its U.S. House members who voted Yes, out of those who voted Yes or No. Colors show the vote, not party.

   Office of the Clerk, U.S. House ↗ — includes how every member voted

Vote types come from the official question text. How we label votes

Legislative history

1. Jan 21, 2026Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2. Jan 21, 2026On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 210 (Roll no. 35). (text: CR H1131-1132)
3. Jan 21, 2026Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 210 (Roll no. 35). (text: CR H1131-1132)
4. Jan 21, 2026On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 210 (Roll no. 34).
5. Jan 21, 2026Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1138-1139)
6. Jan 21, 2026POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1009, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
7. Jan 21, 2026DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1009.
8. Jan 21, 2026Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1131-1138)
9. Jan 20, 2026Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 55.
10. Jan 20, 2026The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6945, H.R. 6359, and H.J. Res. 140 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each measure.
11. Jan 20, 2026The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-459, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
12. Jan 20, 2026The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-459, by Mr. Scott, Austin.