H.Con.Res. 89 · 119th Congress

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

Resolution · does not become lawLatest action Sep 24, 2026: Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 244.

Where it stands

  1. Introduced Done · Apr 23, 2026
  2. Committee Done · Apr 23, 2026
  3. Passed House Done · Jul 23, 2026
  4. Passed Senate Not yet

Failed in the Senate on Sep 24, 2026.

From the official actions on Congress.gov. Resolutions of this kind don't go to the President.

Key points

What it changes
A plain-language summary isn't ready yet. The official summary below describes the bill.
Who it affects
A plain-language summary isn't ready yet. The official summary below describes the bill.
What it costs
No cost estimate yet.
Where it stands
Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 244. (Sep 24, 2026)
What happens next
It failed in the Senate. It moves forward only if it is brought up for another vote.

Official summary

This concurrent resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran or any part of its government or military unless a declaration of war or authorization to use military force for such purpose has been enacted. The resolution specifies that it shall not be construed to prevent the United States from defending itself, its Armed Forces, its diplomatic facilities, or allied states from imminent attack.

Summary by the Congressional Research Service (Introduced in House version), via Congress.gov.

Recorded votes

  1. HOUSEFinal passageJul 23, 2026 · roll call 282

    On Agreeing to the Resolution: Passed (214–208)

    This vote decided whether the bill passes this chamber.
    Votes by party
    How each party voted on roll call 282
    PartyYesNoPresentDid not voteShare voting Yes
    Democratic210002
    Republican420707
    Independent0100

    Party totals from the official roll call.

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House ↗ — includes how every member voted

Vote types come from the official question text. How we label votes

Legislative history

  1. Sep 24, 2026Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 244.
  2. Sep 24, 2026Failed of passage/not agreed to in Senate: Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 244.
  3. Sep 24, 2026Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S4962-4969)
  4. Sep 24, 2026Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged, under the order of 8/8/26.
  5. Sep 24, 2026Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged, under the order of 8/8/26.
  6. Jul 23, 2026Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
  7. Jul 23, 2026Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  8. Jul 23, 2026On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 208 (Roll no. 282).
  9. Jul 23, 2026Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 214 - 208 (Roll no. 282).
  10. Jul 23, 2026Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5186)
  11. Jul 22, 2026POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Con. Res. 89, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the concurrent resolution and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jayapal demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  12. Jul 22, 2026The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
  13. Jul 22, 2026DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 89.
  14. Jul 22, 2026Considered pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H5160-5165; text: CR H5160)
  15. Jul 22, 2026Consideration initiated pursuant to a previous order.
  16. Jul 22, 2026ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Mast asked unanimous consent that, it be in order at any time to consider H. Con. Res. 89 in the House if called up by the chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs or his designee; that the concurrent resolution be considered as read; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to adoption without intervening motion except for one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by Representative Mast of Florida, Representative Meeks of New York, and Representative Jayapal of Washington, or their respective designees. Agreed to without objection.
  17. Apr 23, 2026Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  18. Apr 23, 2026Submitted in House
  19. Apr 23, 2026Submitted in House
MEMBER FEATURE

Save this to your list

Members can save representatives and records and come back to them anytime.

$25 per year · about $2.08 a month · billed annually

Everything you're reading stays free. Membership adds saving and deeper analysis.

Join for $25/year

Already a member? Sign in